Test chart suitability for MTF measurements

Chart suitability display |  Inkjet matte  |  B&W photo paper |  Color LVT | B&W LVT | MTF suitability calculations   Whenever a test chart is used to measure camera MTF (sharpness)— and that includes a large portion of Imatest measurements— we need to know if the chart is good enough to reliably measure MTF. In practice, “good enough” means that chart MTF projected on the image sensor will have little effect on the MTF measurement (which, by definition, includes the chart and the camera). This is generally the case for charts large enough to conform to traditional Imatest recommendations. But there are situations where the charts are […]

Compensating MTF Measurements for Chart Quality Limitations

Camera MTF (sharpness) measurements are subject to a number of variations, some of which, like noise, are random and difficult to control, and some of which are systematic and can be corrected. Variations caused by limitations in chart sharpness are in the latter category. These variations are also affected by the Field of View (FoV) of the image used to test the camera, which is closely related to chart size for charts designed to fill the camera frame. For a given print technology, increasing the FoV, which typically means increasing the spacing between the chart and camera, will increase the […]

Correcting nonuniformity in slanted-edge MTF measurements

Slanted-edge regions can often have non-uniformity across them. This could be caused by uneven illumination, lens falloff, and photoresponse nonuniformity (PRNU) of the sensor.  Uncorrected nonuniformity in a slanted-edge region of interest can lead to an irregularity in MTF at low spatial frequencies. This disrupts the low-frequency reference which used to normalize the MTF curve. If the direction of the nonuniformity goes against the slanted edge transition from light to dark, MTF increases. If the nonuniformity goes in the same direction as the transition from light to dark, MTF decreases.  To demonstrate this effect, we start with a simulated uniform slanted […]

High-contrast edge-SFR test targets produce invalid MTF results

The obsolete ISO 12233:2000 standard defines a resolution test target with a high contrast ratio. These are typically produced at the maximum dynamic range of a printer, which can be anywhere from 40:1 to 80:1.  The high contrast can lead to clipping of the signal which leads to overstated invalid MTF values.

Compensating camera MTF measurements for chart and sensor MTF

Summary— Starting with Imatest 5.1 MTF measurements can be compensated for measured chart quality. Chart MTF compensation can double the megapixel suitability of a test chart. Results taken with different test charts will be more consistent. An approximate lens MTF calculation (independent of chart MTF compensation) has been added. It is based on a geometrical model of sensor MTF, which is used because reliable sensor MTF measurements are difficult to obtain. It’s not perfect, but it is good enough for many measurements. A Chart Quality Calculator lets you determine the suitability of a test chart (based on the camera’s Vertical […]

Measuring MTF with wedges: pitfalls and best practices

This paper was given as part of the Electronic Imaging 2017 Autonomous Vehicles and Machine session. When: Monday, January 30, 2017, at 10:10 am By: Norman Koren with support from Henry Koren, Robert Sumner

Gamma, Chart Contrast and MTF Calculations

A fuller and more up-to-date explanation of gamma, including how to obtain it for slanted-edge MTF calculations can be found on Gamma, Tonal Response Curve, and related concepts. Gamma (the average slope of log pixel levels as a function of log exposure for light through dark gray tones) is used, per the ISO 12233 standard, to linearize the input data, i.e., to remove the gamma encoding applied by the camera or RAW converter. Gamma defaults to 0.5 = 1/2, which is typical of digital cameras, but may be affected by camera or RAW converter settings.  Imatest Settings For accurate calculation of edge-SFR from using […]

Slanted-edge MTF measurement consistency

Note: This page is not quite complete, but we felt that the results are important enough to be presented in its present (nearly complete) state. Method – Results – MTF50 failure – MTF Area In this page we analyze the consistency of slanted-edge MTF measurements, focusing on the effects of noise and region size on measurement consistency. We describe the test procedure in sufficient detail to enable Imatest users to perform similar studies for themselves. We also discuss some important and recognizable situations where consistency may be compromised. these include systems with strong response above the Nyquist frequency (0.5 cycles/pixel), which […]

Infrared Targets, Correction for Slanted-Edge MTF Measurements

Infrared Targets  Standard Imatest inkjet-printed test charts produced prior to February 2016 work in Near InfraRed (NIR) wavelengths out to approximately 1 micron. In February 2016 we upgraded our printers and found (to our disappointment) that our new printers do not have the same reflective densities for NIR wavelengths as for visible wavelengths. We are working out solutions to this issue. Please contact us if your needs include NIR.

Measuring Multiburst pattern MTF with Stepchart

Measuring MTF is not a typical application for Stepchart— certainly not its primary function— but it can be useful with multiburst patterns, which are a legacy from analog imaging that occasionally appear in the digital world. The multiburst pattern is not one of Imatest’s preferred methods for measuring MTF: see the MTF Measurement Matrix for a concise list. But sometimes customers need to analyze them. This feature is available starting with Imatest 4.1.3 (March 2015).

LSF correction factor for slanted-edge MTF measurements

A correction factor for the slanted-edge MTF (Edge SFR; E-SFR) calculations in SFR, SFRplus, eSFR ISO, SFRreg, and Checkerboard was added to Imatest in 2015. This correction factor is included in the ISO 12233:2014 and 2017 standards, but is not in the older ISO 12233:2000 standard. Because it corrects for an MTF loss caused by the numerical calculation of the Line Spread Function (LSF) from the Edge Spread Function (ESF), we call it the LSF correction factor.

A Study of Slanted-Edge MTF Stability and Repeatability

by Jackson K.M. Roland Abstract The slanted-edge method of measuring the spatial frequency response (SFR) as an approximation of the modulation transfer function (MTF) has become a well known and widely

MTF Compare

Compare MTFs of individual edge regions in different cameras and lenses Introduction to MTF Compare MTF Compare (not included in Imatest Studio), is a post-processor for comparing the MTFs of different cameras, lenses, and imaging systems that have been analyzed by SFR, Rescharts Slanted-edge SFR, SFRplus, or eSFR ISO, and had results saved in CSV files. Comparisons are displayed as quotients of MTFs, i.e., transfer functions. For two imaging systems A and B, MTF Compare plots MTF(A)/MTF(B) or MTF(B)/MTF(A) along with MTF(A) and MTB(B) (shown as faint lines below). Details depend on the Display setting. Displays ratios or values of […]

MTF curves and Image appearance

Correlating measurement with appearance Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) is a fundamental measure of imaging system sharpness. It is introduced in Sharpness and discussed further in Sharpening. MTF is measured by Imatest SFR, SFRplus, and by several Rescharts modules. The most frequent questions that arise in sharpness (MTF) testing are “What does the MTF curve mean?” and “How does MTF correlate with image appearance?” In this page we attempt to answer these questions through examples that let you quickly compare images with corresponding MTF curves by clicking on Quick links to the left of each each edge image. Introduction The procedure […]

SFR results: Edge and MTF (Sharpness) plot

A key result of the SFR, SFRplus, and eSFR ISO modules If you entered Imatest on this page, you may want to explore the background information in these links.       Sharpness introduces sharpness measurements and MTF.       How to test Lenses with Imatest contains concise instructions on testing lenses            using SFRplus and eSFR ISO.       Image quality factors lists the factors measured by Imatest.       Table of contents (documentation) Imatest SFR, SFRplus and eSFR ISO display Edge profiles and SFR (Spatial frequency response, i.e., MTF) plots with spatial frequency labeled in one of the following units: Cycles per […]

MTF Compare

Introduction to MTF Compare MTF Compare, a module of Imatest Master,  is a post-processor for comparing the MTFs of different cameras, lenses, and imaging systems after they have been analyzed by SFR or Rescharts Slanted-edge SFR and had results saved in CSV files. Comparisons are displayed as quotients of MTFs, i.e., transfer functions. For two imaging systems A and B, MTF Compare plots MTF(A)/MTF(B) or MTF(B)/MTF(A) along with MTF(A) and MTB(B) (shown as faint lines below). Details depend on the Display setting. Displays ratios or values of MTFnn (spatial frequencies where MTF is nn% of the low frequency value) and […]

ISO 8600 — Medical Endoscopes

Standards: ISO 8600-1 2015: Part 1 — General requirements ISO 8600-2 2015: Part 2 — Particular requirements for rigid bronchoscopes ISO 8600-3 2019: Part 3 — Determination of field of view and direction of view of endoscopes with optics ISO 8600-4 2015: Part 4 — Determination of maximum width of insertion portion ISO 8600-5 2020: Part 5 — Determination of optical resolution of rigid endoscopes with optics ISO 8600-6 2020: Part 6 — Vocabulary ISO 8600-7 2012: Part 7 — Basic requirements for medical endoscopes of water-resistant type ISO 8600-8:2021: Endoscopes — Part 8: Particular requirements for capsule endoscopes Technical […]

Wedge

Analysis of wedge patterns with the  Imatest Wedge and eSFR ISO modules News  2021.2 —  Logarithmic wedges: a superior design describes the advantages of logarithmic wedges, which have a much better distribution of spatial frequencies than hyperbolic wedges, allowing a larger maximum/minimum frequency ratio. Supported by Imatest (automatically detected) since 2021, but (as of May 2022) not currently included in standard eSFR ISO charts (though available on request).  2020.2 —  Calculations were greatly sped up in order to improve performance of direct image acquisition. During the testing of the speedup with direct acquisition, we found that Wedge results were unstable during […]

Version Comparison: Studio vs. Master

Which version is right for you? Imatest 5.0:  All functions of Imatest Image Sensor have been incorporated into Imatest Master.   Imatest is available in several GUI (Graphic User Interface)-based versions. Studio, with everything individual photographers need to test their cameras and lenses. Studio is only available to individual photographers. Master, the full-featured industrial-strength version for engineers and scientists who develop and evaluate imaging systems. Acquire images directly from several manufacturer’s development systems. Images can be updated and analyzed in real time with the Rescharts, Multicharts, and Uniformity-Interactive modules. As of Imatest 5.0, Image Sensor (IS) has been discontinued. All […]

Using SFRreg, Part 3: Results

Imatest SFRreg performs highly automated measurements of sharpness (expressed as Spatial Frequency Response (SFR), also known as Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)) and Lateral Chromatic Aberration from images that contain registration mark patterns (circles that contain two light and two dark quadrants). This document illustrates SFRreg results. Part 1 introduced SFRreg and explained how to obtain and photograph the chart. Part 2 showed how to run SFRreg inside Rescharts and how to save settings for automated runs.   SFRreg results When calculations are complete, results are displayed in the Rescharts window, which allows a number of displays to be selected. The following […]